Racket comparison · 27 September 2026
NOX vs Bullpadel: which padel racket should you choose?
Start with NOX X-Hero if you want a first racket in a 350–360 g range. Compare Bullpadel BP10 EVO if you prefer a round, low-balance option at 360–370 g. For regular club play, Equation Soft and Ionic CTRL offer a more useful comparison than the professional signature models.
At the premium end, compare the standard AT10 Genius 18K Alum 2026 with Vertex 05 2026. The NOX is teardrop-shaped with medium balance in our researched record. The Bullpadel is a high-balance diamond. Start with the AT10 if that teardrop setup matches your existing preferences; investigate Vertex if you already want a diamond and can prepare it reliably.
Both brands cover several playing needs. The three pairs below help you find an entry point without treating one famous racket as representative of an entire range.
Quoted prices checked 16 October 2026
The quick comparison
First racket
Lower listed weight range versus a low-balance, standard-weight alternative
Placement and regular club play
Soft HR3 core and medium balance versus MultiEva and low balance
Experienced performance play
Teardrop and medium balance versus diamond and high balance
These are buying comparisons, not equivalent products at fixed prices. Check the current offer beside each exact model. An older model can remain relevant when its specification and condition suit you.
First racket: X-Hero or BP10 EVO?

NOX X-Hero (2026)
- Shape
- Round
- Balance
- Not listed
- Listed weight
- 350–360 g
- Face
- Fiber Glass 3K, three-layer fibreglass
- Core
- HR3 White EVA
- Frame
- Carbon

Bullpadel BP10 EVO (2023)
- Shape
- Round
- Balance
- Low balance
- Listed weight
- 360–370 g
- Face
- Polyglass fibreglass
- Core
- SoftEva
- Frame
- CarbonTube; 100% carbon
X-Hero has a round head, a carbon frame, a fibreglass face and HR3 White EVA. Its 350–360 g specification makes it the first model in this pair to investigate when your current racket feels too heavy. NOX calls the face Fiber Glass 3K; the word carbon describes the frame, not that hitting surface.
BP10 EVO combines a round head and low balance with a Polyglass fibreglass face and SoftEva core. The linked product is the 2023 model, weighing 360–370 g. Its low balance is useful information, but it still carries more nominal mass than much of X-Hero's range.
Choose X-Hero when a lower weight range is the clear requirement. Keep BP10 on the shortlist if you already like a standard-weight round racket and want to compare the current deal. We do not have a verified balance measurement for X-Hero, so the scale weights alone cannot settle which finished racket you will prepare more comfortably.
For a first purchase, use a familiar club racket as your reference. Note whether the problem is late preparation, an uncomfortable grip or contact you dislike. Buying the more expensive option without identifying that problem makes the comparison harder.
The choice: lower listed weight range versus a low-balance, standard-weight alternative.
Club play: Equation Soft or Ionic CTRL?

NOX Equation Soft Advanced (2026)
- Shape
- Round
- Balance
- Medium balance (manufacturer description; no measurement published)
- Listed weight
- 360–375 g
- Face
- Fiber Glass 3K, three-layer fibreglass
- Core
- HR3 Soft EVA
- Frame
- Carbon

Bullpadel Ionic CTRL 2026
- Shape
- Round
- Balance
- Low balance
- Listed weight
- 365–375 g
- Face
- Glaphite: carbon and fibreglass
- Core
- MultiEva
- Frame
- CarbonTube, 100% carbon
Equation Soft Advanced 2026 is round, medium-balanced and specified at 360–375 g. It pairs a fibreglass face with HR3 Soft EVA. We would start here when softer contact is a deliberate preference and you are comfortable with a standard-weight racket.
Ionic CTRL 2026 is the same exact product Bullpadel calls Ionic Control 26. It is round and low-balanced, weighs 365–375 g, and combines a Glaphite carbon/fibreglass face with a MultiEva core. It is our alternative for a club player who wants that low-balance layout.
The material names do not provide a universal firmness scale. Equation has an explicitly soft core; MultiEva describes Bullpadel's layered construction. We have not measured both rackets on the same test rig and will not turn those names into a made-up hardness score.
For this pair, compare blocked volleys, short defensive swings and lobs before full-power shots. Look for the racket that lets you repeat the depth you intended. If reducing total weight is the main goal, neither model should be your automatic next step: both specifications reach 375 g.
The choice: soft HR3 core and medium balance versus MultiEva and low balance.
How the NOX and Bullpadel ranges differ
NOX's names need careful reading. X-Hero is a starting option, while Equation includes separate Soft and Hard versions. The standard AT10 Genius and AT10 Genius Attack also differ: adding Attack changes the 2026 18K model to a diamond. A review of one is not automatically evidence about the other.
Bullpadel presents a wider set of family names in our catalogue, including Ionic, Vertex, Hack, Neuron, Elite and Pearl. Within a family, Light, Hybrid, Comfort, Cloud and event editions can change the specification. Vertex 05 and Vertex 05 Hybrid should be treated as separate products.
Compare constructions inside each range before deciding which brand to buy. NOX includes soft round rackets as well as advanced attacking options. Bullpadel includes low-balance round models as well as high-balance diamonds. A brand label cannot replace the exact model name.
Which brand offers better value?
Compare what you would pay for the model that fits your needs. A discounted advanced racket can still be an expensive mistake if its weight or response makes ordinary rallies harder. A starter racket can be good value without becoming a long-term match for every player.
Our retailer coverage is a selection of partner listings, not the entire market. The buttons and prices above refer to the exact connected products. We retain a valid retailer link when an item is temporarily unavailable, but only quote a current price when the regional offer meets our checks.
For an older product such as BP10 EVO 2023, confirm the year, condition and seller's return terms. For a current AT10 or Vertex, check the version just as carefully. Standard, Attack, Hybrid and special editions should not be merged because the photographs look similar.
What a brand comparison cannot tell you
We do not have controlled long-term failure data that establishes either brand as more durable. Individual reports can flag a question worth asking, but they cannot establish a brand-wide defect rate.
Grip setup and the weight of the individual unit also matter. If a narrow weight target is central to your choice, ask the retailer whether it can confirm the actual racket's weight. Then allow for the grips and protection you normally add.
Frequently asked questions
- Is NOX or Bullpadel better for a beginner?
- Start with the exact racket. X-Hero offers a lower listed weight range; BP10 EVO offers a round, low-balance setup at standard weight. Choose according to the handling you need.
- Is Equation Soft comparable with Ionic CTRL?
- Yes, as two round options for a club-player shortlist. Their balance, face and core constructions differ, so they should not be treated as identical alternatives.
- Is AT10 Genius easier than Vertex 05?
- The standard AT10's teardrop shape and medium-balance classification provide a different starting point from Vertex's high-balance diamond. Ease of use still depends on the player and finished setup.
- Does 18K carbon beat 12K carbon?
- The K label alone does not rank complete rackets. The weave, layup, core and construction also differ. Compare the specific models and your response to them.
- Should I avoid a 2023 racket?
- Its age alone does not settle the purchase. Confirm the exact model, condition, price and return terms, and compare it with current alternatives that suit the same need.
- Have you tested these rackets together?
- No. This is a researched editorial comparison using manufacturer specifications, verified product identities and attributed external observations. We do not present it as our own court test.
How we made this comparison
PadelFormat Editorial Team · 27 September 2026
The PadelFormat editorial team checked the exact years and constructions, reviewed available external testing and player discussion, and selected three practical buying comparisons. Recommendations remain stable when prices or stock change. Affiliate commission does not decide which racket suits a player.
Use the full NOX and Bullpadel guides to explore other models. If neither side answers what you want to change about your current racket, use the racket chooser to widen the comparison.
PadelFormat may earn a commission when you buy through selected links, at no additional cost to you. Recommendations are based on product fit and editorial criteria, not commission levels.

