Head

HEAD Radical Team (2026)

Editorial assessment · 2026 model

The Radical Team 2026 is worth a look if you like a softer contact and prefer weight closer to the handle. HEAD lists 360 g and a 255 mm balance, with a teardrop head, fibreglass face and Control Foam. We would start here within the Radical range for an improving player who wants a soft response for blocks, lobs and controlled volleys.

Best for
Improving and experienced players who prefer a soft contact and build their game around placement.
Main trade-off
Team offers the softest feel classification in this Radical group, but Motion has the lower nominal weight.
HEAD Radical Team 2026 padel racket
  • ShapeTeardrop
  • Weight360 g (nominal; manufacturer tolerance unverified)
  • BalanceLow balance (255 mm)
  • LevelIntermediate

Where to buy

€129.95

In stock at Padel Market

Buy now at Padel Market

PadelFormat may earn a commission when you buy through selected links, at no additional cost to you. Recommendations are based on product fit and editorial criteria, not commission levels.

Our assessment

Choose between Team and Motion

Choose by feel and handling. Team uses fibreglass and is classified Soft; Motion uses Double Carbon and is classified Hard. Team also has the lower balance point, at 255 mm versus 260 mm, while Motion weighs 5 g less.

Those differences pull in different directions. If you want a softer contact, start with Team. If you want to reduce total weight while keeping a firmer response, compare Motion. Try repeated blocks and volleys to decide which you prepare more comfortably.

Consider an alternative if: Lower total weight is your priority, or you specifically want a firm carbon face.

Strengths

  • Its 255 mm balance sits below Motion and Pro's 260 mm.
  • The fibreglass face provides the soft option alongside the Double Carbon models.
  • Soft Cap+ allows the wrist cord to be replaced.

Drawbacks

  • At 360 g nominal, it is heavier than Motion despite its softer construction.
  • The smooth face will not suit buyers specifically looking for raised texture.

Specifications

Shape
Teardrop
Balance
Low balance (255 mm)
Weight
360 g (nominal; manufacturer tolerance unverified)
Surface
Fibreglass
Core
Control Foam
Surface texture
Smooth
Hardness
Soft
Technologies
Auxetic 2.0, Updated hole pattern, Soft Cap+ with exchangeable cord, 38 mm thickness, 461 cm² head surface
Manufacturer code
222056
Barcode (EAN)
0198772134457

FAQ

Is Radical Team lighter than Radical Motion?
No. Team is listed at 360 g nominal and Motion at 355 g. Team feels softer according to HEAD's classifications and has a lower balance point, but neither makes it the lighter racket. Choose Team for its softer response, not to save weight over Motion.
Is Radical Team suitable for a beginner?
It could suit an improving beginner who handles 360 g comfortably and already prefers a softer contact. HEAD positions it for intermediate and advanced players. For a first racket with no clear preferences yet, we would start by comparing Vibe or Bolt before moving into the Radical range.

Alternatives

Nox Equation Hard Advanced 2026 (Racket) product photograph supplied by the retailer

Nox

NOX Equation Hard Advanced (2026)

The firmer Equation for intermediate players who prefer a round head. It uses a fibreglass face, HR3 Hard EVA and Exclusive Spin texture, with a 355–365 g range. Compare it with Soft if your current racket feels too springy on blocks and volleys.

Shape
Round
Weight
355–365 g
Balance
Medium
Face
Fiber Glass 3K
Nox Equation Soft Advanced 2026 (Racket) product photograph supplied by the retailer

Nox

NOX Equation Soft Advanced (2026)

A soft-feeling round racket for improving players. Equation Soft has an HR3 Soft EVA core, fibreglass face and Exclusive Spin texture. Choose it over Hard for the softer contact; NOX's current listing puts its weight at 360–375 g.

Shape
Round
Weight
360–375 g
Balance
Medium
Face
Fiber Glass 3K

Not sure this is your racket?

Answer a few short questions and the chooser compares the whole catalogue for you.

Open the racket chooser

Researched 2026-09-07 · Last updated 2026-09-07 · How we assess gear